Baseless optimism vs. sure-thing Timesizing®
[Commentary] ©1999-2002 Philip Hyde, Timesizing Assocs, Box 622, Cambridge MA 02140 USA (617)623-8080 - HOMEPAGE

America's supposed "labor shortage"
at least in high tech
[First, check out our surplus commodity page, then this article where a New York Times columnist exposes the bogus 'labor shortage' in the high-tech context -]
How to create a skilled-labor shortage,
by Richard Rothstein, 9/06/2000 NYT, A26.
To alleviate apparent shortages of computer programmers, Pres. Clinton and Congress have agreed to raise a quota on H-1b's, the temporary visas for skilled foreigners. The annual limit will go to 200,000 next year, up from 65,000 only three years ago. The imported workers, most of whom come from India, are said to be needed because American schools do not graduate enough young people with science and math skills...
But the crisis is a mirage. High-tech companies portray a shortage, yet it is our memories that are short: only yesterday there was a glut of science and math graduates. The computer industry took advantage of that glut by reducing wages. This discouraged youths from entering the field, creating the temporary shortages of today. Now, taking advantage of a public preconception that school failures have created the problem, industry finds a ready audience for its demands to import workers.
This newspaper covered the earlier surplus extensively.
In fields with real labor scarcity, wages rise. Yet despite accounts of dot-com entrepreneurs' becoming millionaires, trends in computer technology do not confirm a need to import legions of programmers. Industry spokesmen say older programmers with outdated skills would take too long to retrain.
[But everyone's skills are outdated when software revs change every two months!]
...Dr. Matloff counters by saying that when they urge more H-1B visas, lobbyists demonstrate a shortage by pointing to vacancies lasting many months. Companies could train older programmers in less time than it takes to process visas for cheaper foreign workers.
[Dr. Matloff might also have pointed out the raised job qualifications relative to the 1980s, a result of the flood of resumes that spoiled high-tech employers, made them think they need do no training, and indeed, made them think they could choose cheap young kids whom they could easily pressure to work megahours of unpaid overtime.]
Dr. Matloff says that in addition to the pay issue, the industry rejects older workers because they will not work the long hours typical at Silicon Valley companies with youthful "singles" styles. Imported labor, he argues, is only a way to avoid offering better conditions to experienced programmers. H-1B workers, in contrast, cannot demand higher pay: visas are revoked if workers leave their sponsoring companies.
[= the return of indentured servitude.]
As for young computer workers, the labor market has recently tightened, with rising wages, because college students saw earlier wage declines and stopped majoring in math and science. In 1996, American colleges awarded 25,000 bachelor's degrees in computer science, down from 42,000 in 1985.
The reason is not that students suddenly lacked preparation. On the contrary, high school course-taking in math and science, including advanced placement, had climbed. Further, math scores have risen: last year 24% of seniors who took the SAT scored over 600 in math. But only 6% planned to major in computer science, and many of these cannot get into college programs.
The reason: colleges themselves have not yet adjusted to new demand. In some places, computer science courses are so oversubscribed that students must get on waiting lists as high school juniors.
With a time lag between student choice of majors and later job quests, high schools and colleges cannot address short-term supply and demand shifts for particular professions. Such shortages can be erased only by raising wages to attract those with needed skills who are now working in other fields - or by importing low-paid workers.
[Or by using the incidence of overtime itself to target and trigger on-the-job training, àa la Timesizing's Phase 2 and Phase 3.]
For the longer term, rising wages can guide counselors to encourage well-prepared students to major in computer science and engineering, and colleges will adjust to rising demand. But more H-1B immigrants can have a perverse effect, as their lower pay signals young people to avoid this field in the future, keeping the domestic supply artificially low.
[Hear, hear. A wonderful article. Many thanks to Richard Rothstein at rrothstein@nytimes.com ]

For more details, see our campaign piece Timesizing, Not Downsizing, which is available online from *Amazon.com and at the Harvard Square Coop, Cambridge, Mass. (3d floor, economics or mgmt).

Questions, comments, feedback? Phone 617-623-8080 (Boston) or email us.


Top | Homepage